From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

Like this article?

Get your free daily medical news from Physician's First Watch.

RSS

Progesterone Gives Mixed Results in Preventing Premature Delivery

Two trials of progesterone to reduce prematurity provide disparate results. The studies appear in the current New England Journal of Medicine.

The first study randomized 250 women with cervical lengths 15 mm or less to receive either daily intravaginal progesterone or placebo. The relative risk for spontaneous delivery before 34 weeks' gestation was 0.56 in the progesterone group.

The second study randomized 655 women with twin gestations to either weekly injections of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate or placebo. In that trial there were no differences in outcome.

Although the authors of the first study say that their results support use of progesterone in women with a short cervix, an editorialist, citing "uncertainties about both efficacy and fetal safety" concludes that the drug "is not yet ready to enter the therapeutic armamentarium as a pregnancy-prolonging agent."

Link: NEJM article on short-cervix prematurity (Free abstract with one-time registration; full text requires subscription)

Link: NEJM article on prematurity in twins (Free abstract with one-time registration; full text requires subscription)

Link: NEJM editorial (Subscription required)

Link: Journal Watch General Medicine coverage (Free)

Link: Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine coverage (Free)

Link: Journal Watch Women's Health coverage of article 1 (Free)

Link: Journal Watch Women's Health coverage of article 2 (Free)

Published in Physician's First Watch August 2, 2007

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2007. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.